Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies: E-journal, Vol 3.2, Barrett

Click here return to the Hualin main page.

Click here return to the Hualin E-Journal Vol 3.2 Table of Contents page.

 

Hualin International Journal of Buddhist Studies 3.2 (2020): 162–181; https://dx.doi.org/10.15239/hijbs.03.02.08
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buddhism and Technology, and Epigraphy)

Download full text PDF

 

Against Epigraphy: Once More a Visit to Zen and History

T. H. BARRETT
Emeritus
SOAS, London
tb2@soas.ac.uk

Abstract: When in 1938 the pioneering Japanese Buddhist historian Ui Hakuju 宇井白寿 extended his research to investigating the lineage of the eighth century Chan master Weiyan of Yaoshan 藥山惟儼, he rejected the evidence contained in the master’s epitaph by Tang Shen 唐伸, on the grounds that this inscription was probably a later forgery. Subsequent scholarship has generally come to the conclusion that the epitaph can only be genuine. Yet even as an indubitable historical document, it still needs to be read carefully with a view to the probable circumstances of its composition, as well as to possible problems in its transmission.

Keywords: Tang Shen, Ui Hakuju, Yaoshan Weiyan, Chinese Buddhist histories, Tang epigraphy

 

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.