December 2018, Princeton University
Title: “Rethinking the Structure and Typology of Liturgical Texts from Dunhuang”
Lecturer: Hao Chunwen (Capital Normal University)
November 2018, University of Oxford
Title: “Sattva/Satva, zhongsheng 衆生 and youqing 有情, synonymous or not”
Lecturer: Funayama Toru (Kyoto University)
This seminar supported by the Glorisun Foundation and led by Prof. Funayama Toru 船山徹 (Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University), took place on November 26th, 2018 at the Oriental Institute, University of Oxford.
The seminar focused on shifts in the Chinese understanding of the key Buddhist term Sattva/Satva, as reflected by translations and commentarial sources produced during the medieval period. It gave graduate students at Oxford a unique opportunity to read and analyse primary sources relevant to this important terminological and conceptual issue with Prof. Funayama, one of the world’s leading scholars in the study of Chinese Buddhist translations.
November 2018, UBC
Title: “Rethinking the Structure and Typology of Liturgical Texts from Dunhuang 敦煌寫本齋文的分類、定名及其文本結構”
Lecturer: Hao Chunwen (Capital Normal University)
This talk gives an overview of recent thinking on the typology and structure of the liturgical texts found among the Dunhuang manuscripts. I propose dividing the thousands of liturgical texts found at Dunhuang into two main categories: liturgical protocols (zhaiyi 齋儀) and liturgies (zhaiwen 齋文). Liturgical protocols (sometimes called “written protocols,” shuyi 書儀) were used as references for drafting liturgies. Liturgies, written up on the basis of these liturgical protocols, were functional documents that were read aloud at all kinds of ritual gatherings. 數以千記的敦煌寫本齋文可以分為《齋儀》和齋文兩類，《齋儀》與《書儀》性質相同，是供起草齋文參考用的文書；齋文是依據《齋儀》起草的在各類齋會上宣讀的文書，是實用文本。
We can also divide the structure of the liturgies into five parts: the “opening” (haotou 號頭), “exaltation of virtues” (tande 歎德), “liturgical purpose” (zhaiyi 齋意), “ritual area” (daochang 道場), and “adornment” (zhuangyan 莊嚴). This structure is roughly applicable to liturgical protocols and liturgies with all manners of content, including hymns of praise, apotropaic rituals, healing rites, and mourning rites, though there are of course many variations in the specific arrangement and sequence of the parts. 齋文的文本結構可以分為“號頭”、“歎德”、“齋意”、“道場”和“莊嚴”五個部分。《齋儀》和齋文集的結構大致包括讚頌功德、攘災、患差、悼亡等諸多方面的內容，但具體編排次序有多種樣態。
This talk will also touch on the commonly used term “prayer texts” (yuanwen 願文). I will suggest that this is a specific kind of liturgical text and that the term cannot be used as a blanket reference to the broader category of “liturgical text.” “願文”是齋文的一種，不能作為“齋文”類文書的通稱。
November 2018, Yale University
Title: “The Department of Religious Studies and the Glorisun Global Network for Buddhist Studies present: The Indian Ocean Trade Through Buddhist Iconographies”
Lecturer: Osmund Bopearachchi (University of California, Berkeley)
October 2018, UBC
Title: “Ritual, Reliquary, and Local Legend: Glocal Context of Twin Pagodas from the Silla Dynasty”
Lecturer: Youn-mi Kim (Ehwa Womans University)
[photo credit: Ahn Jangheon]
October 2018, UBC
Title: “Making Frogbear Materials Meaningful in the Undergraduate Classroom”
Lecturer: Susan Andrews (Mount Allison University)
This workshop invites us to consider how the new textual and visual sources brought together by Frogbear’s research teams can be meaningfully used in the undergraduate classroom. In addition to introducing the kinds of sources the international team of scholars and students have collected thus far, the presentation will offer some concrete strategies for bringing these materials from the field to life in undergraduate contexts.
October 2018, UC-Berkeley
Title: “Politics in the Translation of Buddhist Texts: Timothy Richard and the Awakening of Faith”
Lecturer: Gong Jun (Sun Yat-sen University)
This presentation focuses on the political rhetoric hidden in the English translation by Timothy Richard (1845-1919) of the Awakening of Faith (Dasheng qixin lun 大乘起信論), one of the most popular Buddhist texts in East Asia. It first treats Richard’s translation as an important event in the intellectual history by placing it back to the distinctly different veins of Buddhist studies respectively in China and in the West since the nineteenth century. It then explores Richard’s creative interpretations for the two key Buddhist concepts of Mahāyāna and Hinayana as well as his hidden writing strategies while translating and interpreting Buddhist texts. Finally, the speech also analyzes in detail the ‘Western “matching-meaning”’ (yang geyi 洋格義) as expressed in the translation of the Awakening of Faith, bringing to light Richard’s Christian reconstruction of Buddhist scriptures over the course of translation.
October 2018, UBC and University of California at Berkeley
Title: “Taixu’s Global Buddhist Movement and His Discourse on Civilization: A Study Centered around the 1920s”
Lecturer: Gong Jun (Sun Yat-sen University)
This lecture, primarily from the perspective of and with the methodology of intellectual history, discusses thoroughly the World Buddhism campaign that Master Taixu (1890-1947) launched during the 1920s and his discursive discussion about civilizations at the same time. It consists of three aspects. In the context of the debate on the Western civilization and culture in the Chinese thought circle during the 1920s, it first examines Master Taixu’s theory regarding the Eastern and Western civilizations so as to understand his situation in the intellectual history. It then discusses in details the discourse of civilization theory Taixu preached during his visit to Europe in 1920s, especially how he created new theories through analogically interpreting (geyi 格義) Buddhist ideas with concepts of Western science and philosophy. This lecture ends with critically evaluating Taixu’s ideas. It sheds new light on the complex ideological orientation behind it, especially the orientalism and nationalism hidden in his idea of civilization.
October 2018, Yale University
Title: “Interfusing Doctrinal Learning and Visualization Techniques: Ŭich’ŏn and the Founding of the Ch’ŏnt’ae Tradition in Early Koryŏ”
Lecturer: Richard McBride (Brigham Young University)
October 2018, UBC
Title: “From Tranquility (ji 寂) to Illumination (zhao 照): The Jizhao Temple in the Context of Social Changes in Dali Prefecture”
Lecturer: Xuan Fang (Academy for Advanced study of Religion, RUC)
The Jizhao temple, which means tranquility and illumination, is located in Mount Cangshan of Dali Prefecture. It was established in the early years of Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) and was rebuilt in 1919 by the Yunnan Governor Tang Jiyao. Its status as a Buddhist temple resumed in the early 1980s, when it changed from a monastery into a nunnery. Since then, it remains in tranquility and silence as its name implies. Meanwhile, with the vigorous growth of mobile internet and we-media, it has suddenly become an internet sensation almost overnight and was titled “the most beautiful nunnery”, and “the best temple of petty bourgeoisie taste”. Based on interviews with the abbot of Jizhao temple, Ven. Miaohui, and from speaking with lay Buddhists and some other local senior monks, this article tries to sketch out the process of its transformation, sociocultural contexts and subsequent effects as well.The speech looks back to four relating sociocultural factors in historical order: first, the common cultural memory of local people who cherish Cangshan mountain and the temples around it as the soul of local culture; second, the romantic imagination constructed by popular novels and mass media about Dali Buddhism, which in turn reshaped the recovery process of local temples; third, the utopic fantasy of reclusive hermits beyond the state control, held by immigratory artists and dissidents; and fourth, the changed religious ecologic pattern with the large influx of new Buddhist residents, driven by the apocalyptic prophecy of a famous monk. Although all above factors contribute to the sudden fame of Jizhao Temple, two key events should be emphasized: the temple’s elaborate reconstruction in 2012 and the subsequent voluntary advertisement through we-media, which exposed this small nunnery to the whole country in an explosive style. This sudden exposure through mobile internet changed the Jizhao Temple in many ways and subsequently brought out many unexpected effects.
This presentation ends with a reflective discussion on the tension between the multiplicity of objectification and subjectivity of the Jizhao Temple as well as the self-identity of the nuns who reside there.
October 2018, Yale University
Title: “Buddhist Astrology and Astral Magic in Medieval China: Indian and Iranian Connections”
Lecturer: Jeffrey Kotyk (McMaster University)
September 2018, Yale University
Title: “The Heavenly Masters at Longhushan: The origins of the modern Daoist bureaucracy”
Lecturer: Vincent Goossaert (EPHE: Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes)
The talk will outline a history of this institution, from its roots in the early Tianshidao church, to the emergence of the Longhushan Zhangs and their progressive rise to the nexus of Daoist bureaucracy and its ramifications in every city and village of imperial China. It will focus on explaining how and why this new type of religious bureaucracy developed in its spatial and historical context: the transition from aristocratic medieval society to early modern China and its southward expansion.
September 2018, University of Oxford
Title：”Buddhism and the Religious Other ”
On September 9-10th 2018, the Glorisun Global Buddhist Network at the University of Oxford supported a workshop on the theme of Buddhism and the Religious Other. This entailed two days of papers and discussion concerned with the representations of non-Buddhist ideas, practices, and their exponents in South and East Asian Buddhist literature. While the first day focused on Buddhism in its Indian context – featuring papers that dealt with Buddhist understanding of its relationship to Brahmanism and Jainism in particular – the second day was devoted to questions of Buddhist identity and ‘othering’ in East Asian Buddhist history.
Participants presented on the formation of Buddhist identity in tandem with developments in organized Daoism (Christine Mollier, CNRS Paris); expressions of distinctive Buddhist identity contra Daoism in the medieval period (Stephen Bokenkamp, Arizona State University), and the dynamics of Buddhist identity in China as informed by patterns of religious discourse across Eurasia (Antonello Palumbo, SOAS London). Papers in the afternoon concerned Buddhist mechanisms for understanding Neo-Confucianism (Tim Barrett, SOAS London) and the boundaries between Buddhist and extraneous ritual in Heian Japan (Benedetta Lomi, University of Bristol).
The event was hosted by Christopher V. Jones, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford.
September 2018, Yale University
Title: “Incarnations and the Six-Syllable Formula of Avalokiteśvara in the Kāraṇḍavyūha-sūtra”
Lecturer: Ruriko Sakuma
September 2018, UBC
Title: “Reimagining East Asian Buddhism: Wuyue Foundations of Song Dynasty Buddhism and Beyond (The Hangzhou Region as Buddhist Hub and Homeland)”
Lecturer: Albert Welter (University of Arizona)
Buddhist Studies has been conducted in such a way, from its inception, so as to privilege developments in India and South Asia, and to look at regional developments elsewhere as outgrowths and diversions of Indian based models. The story told in virtually all major textbooks is one that provides coverage of Indian developments, treating other regions, like East Asia, as an afterthought. This was not accidental, but was the outgrowth of specific cultural frameworks that inspired the Western academic study of Buddhism.By the tenth century Buddhism in India had dissolved and ceased to be a source of inspiration. At the same time Chinese Buddhism initiated new forms of Buddhism, highly Sinicized, where Indian Buddhist content retained a passive influence but no longer as active inspiration. My presentation focuses on one region of China, Wuyue, centered in Hangzhou, that forged an identity as a new Buddhist homeland based on new and unprecedented forms of Buddhist thought, practice and institutional structures. These developed to become foundational in the Song dynasty and served as models in the dispersion of new, authentic forms of Buddhism throughout East Asia that remain integral to East Asian Buddhism down to the present day.
August 2018, Peking University
Title: “律藏研究系列讲座”
Lecturer: 佐佐木教授 (日本花园大学), 山极伸之教授 (日本佛教大学)
邀请日本花园大学的佐佐木教授做专题讲座《律藏研究的历史与现状》、《律藏研究的现代意义》，日本佛教大学的山极伸之教授做专题讲座《律藏的写本研究》，北京地区相关研究学者基本均参会聆听。
June 2018, Peking University
Title: “如何是道？——“平常心是道”源流探析”
Lecturer: 日本驹泽大学佛教学部藤井淳副教授
June 2018, University of Oxford
Title：”Exploring Mahāyāna Sūtra Anthologies: Reading workshop on the Zhujing yaoji (T 847)”
Lecturer: Paul Harrison, Stanford University
This workshop will be devoted to reading selections from a Mahāyāna sūtra anthology of uncertain date extant only in Chinese, the Dasheng xiuxing pusa xingmen zhujing yaoji 大乘修行菩薩行門諸經要集 (T 847), translated in 721 by Zhiyan 智嚴. After a general introduction to this type of literature, paying particular attention to the Sūtrasamuccaya attributed to Nāgārjuna and the well-known Śikṣāsamuccaya of Śāntideva, participants will read and discuss two or three sample sections of the Zhujing yaoji, comparing them with other versions of the source texts in question and, if appropriate, with citations of the same passages in the Sūtrasamuccaya and the Śikṣāsamuccaya. Copies of the texts to be read will be made available to all participants nearer the date of the workshop.
Those wishing to take part should be able to read at least one of the following languages: Chinese, Sanskrit, Tibetan.
April 2018, Yale University
Title: “From Hero to Heretic: The Pioneering Life and Posthumous Conviction of the 20th Century Burmese Monk Shin Ukkaṭṭha”
Lecturer: Kate Crosby (King’s College, London)
April 2018, Peking University
Title: “现代常熟市《香山宝卷》的表演仪式与中国民间佛教信仰”
Lecturer: 白若思
April 2018, Yale University
Title: “Tusk, Musk, and Yellow Jade Orchid: The Legal Regulation of Buddhism on the Silk Road”
Lecturer: Cuilan Liu (Emmanuel College of Victoria University in the University of Toronto)
February 2018, Yale University
Title: “The Bodhisattva’s Last Mission before Awakening”
Lecturer: Vincent Eltschinger (Paris Sciences & Lettres University)
November 2017, Yale University
Title: “Interactions between Indian and Chinese Culture in Buddhist Monasteries in 9th-10th Century Dunhuang”
“Traditional Community Associations (she 社) and Buddhism in Medieval China”
Lecturer: Hao Chunwen (Capital Normal University)
This paper is a preliminary study of the relationship between traditional community associations in villages, towns, and cities that originally involved semi-annual sacrifices and the Buddhist religion during the Wei, Jin, Northern-Southern, Sui and Tang dynasties (fourth-tenth centuries). It reveals that during Jin, Southern-North-ern and Sui, the main conflict between the early associations and Buddhist monks concerned the killing of ani-mals. It further shows that later, in the seventh-tenth centuries, the two traditions came to a less confrontational arrangement, involving mutual understanding and assimilation. In the earlier stage, Buddhist monks fought against Chinese traditional culture, trying to persuade village associations to accept foreign ideas and give up traditional practices. This changed during the second stage, when monasteries and monks adopted a more co-operative attitude. The lecture addresses the problem of taking life in Buddhism and Chinese culture, Confucian values, debates over the making of statues, mortuary practice, monasticism, and the conflict of cultures. Evidence is drawn from stone stelae inscriptions, biographies and histories, as well as manuscripts.
November 2017, Yale University
Title: “The Philosophy and Practice of Buddhist Confession in the Song Dynasty”
Lecturer: Sheng Kai (Tsinghua University)
During the Tang and Song dynasty, Chinese Buddhism underwent a great change, from theory investigation to religion practice. Buddhism in the Song dynasty showed a great orientation toward practice. Confession practices prevailed widely among Tiantai members, and confession ritual procedures were also produced during this time. Jingyuan（1011－1088）, a revivalist scholar of Huayan School, had to make efforts to implement the ideas of his own school in order to keep up with the trend. Huayan School lacked a practical aspect. Jingyuan edited Xiuzheng yi, reducing eighteen fascicles into one. However, this work actually reduced the characteristics of Huayan Confession itself, which emphasizes contemplation and thought. The Confession not only constituted a ritual that eliminates individual transgressions and karma, it also included rituals that aim at higher goals. At that time, with particular concerns in the background of “Protecting the Nation via Buddhism” (Guojia Fojiao), it transformed into a ritual that eliminates common karma, in order to protect the nation. In the Song periods, Buddhist communes or societies continued to develop. They brought together various beliefs, and became a type of community united by Confession practices. Under the influence of Confession practices, Chinese Buddhism became popularized and socialized in this period.
October 2017, UBC
Title: “The Thirteenth Fourteenth Century Encounter of Chinese Tiantai and Japanese Tendai”
Lectuer: Paul Groner (Religious Studies, University of Virginia)
The Japanese monk Shunjō 俊芿 (1155-1227) traveled to China and studied Tiantai, Pure Land and the precepts for thirteen years. When he returned to Japan, he brought back one of the largest collections of Chinese texts from the Song Dynasty and practices that radically differed from those used by Japanese Tendai monks. Although he enjoyed great success in many ways, he had limited success in influencing Tendai monastic discipline. In this lecture, I look at how an eminent Japanese scholar Ninkū 仁空 (1309-1388) responded to some of Shunjō’s challenges.
October 2017, UBC
Title: “The Philosophy and Practice of Buddhist Confession in the Song Dynasty”
Lecturer: Sheng Kai (Tsinghua University)
During the Tang and Song dynasty, Chinese Buddhism underwent a great change, from theory investigation to religion practice. Buddhism in the Song dynasty showed a great orientation toward practice. Confession practices prevailed widely among Tiantai members, and confession ritual procedures were also produced during this time. Jingyuan 净源 (1011-1088), a revivalist scholar of Huayan School, had to make efforts to implement the ideas of his own school in order to keep up with the trend. Huayan School lacked a practical aspect. Jingyuan edited Xiuzheng yi（圓覺經修證儀）, reducing eighteen fascicles into one. However, this work actually reduced the characteristics of Huayan Confession itself, which emphasizes contemplation and thought. The Confession not only constituted a ritual that eliminates individual transgressions and karma, it also included rituals that aim at higher goals. At that time, with particular concerns in the background of “Protecting the Nation via Buddhism” (Guojia Fojiao 國家佛教), it transformed into a ritual that eliminates common karma, in order to protect the nation. In the Song periods, Buddhist communes or societies (sheyi 社邑) continued to develop. They brought together various beliefs, and became a type of community united by Confession practices. Under the influence of Confession practices, Chinese Buddhism became popularized and socialized in this period.
September 2017, UBC
Title: “Diving into Buddhahood: The Four Inversions at Shanyingshan and Baoshan”
Lecturer: Wendi Adamek (University of Calgary)
In this talk, I focus on two rock-cut tributes to the Nirvāṇa-sūtra’s characterization of nirvāṇa as permanence, joy, self, and purity (chang le wo jing 常樂我凈). In the first part I introduce these terms, known as the “four inversions.” Chinese interest in the Nirvāṇa-sūtra’s chang le wo jing rubric can be seen in various Northern Dynasties, Sui and Tang works, both textual and visual, that support tathāgatagarbha (buddha-matrix) soteriology. At the first site we will examine, the middle or central cave of Shanyingshan 善應山 (Henan), we find an illustration of the chang le wo jing rubric in the Brāhmana Jātaka from the Nirvāṇa-sūtra, as well as a passage on contemplation of the body from the same sūtra. Second, on a rock-face near Dazhusheng 大住勝 cave at Baoshan 寶山 (Henan), we find an undated inscription consisting of variations on the Brāhmana Jātaka verses. I discuss in turn the Nirvāṇa-sūtra and these two sites of inscription and image in order to highlight their illustrations of “inversion” as the key relation between no-self and the actualization of “self” promised in the sūtra, an alluring potential that we find courted by various names in the body of literature loosely designated as “tathāgatagarbha” texts.
April 2017, Yale University
Title: “In the Wake of the Mongols: The Making of a New Social Order in North China, 1200-1600”
Lecturer: Jinping Wang (National University of Singapore)
In the two decades between 1211 and 1234, the Mongols swept through North China under the Jurchen-Jin dynasty (1125-1234), waging the most destructive war in the history of imperial China. Wiping out more than half of the population and ruining much of the farmland, the Mongols destroyed the underpinnings of the entire society in North China and caused the old order to collapse. From the early years of their conquest, instead of relying on Confucian-educated literati to rebuild local society like the Jurchens had done, the Mongols shifted financial and political support to Quanzhen Daoist and Buddhist religious orders, making their clergy one of the most powerful social groups. Men from different social levels, and a surprising number of women as well, assembled in the Buddhist and Daoist orders and played significant roles in rebuilding postwar society, reviving the economy, and reshaping social values. Clergy and their religious institutions acquired sufficient power to occupy considerable social space between family and state, which led to the emergence of a new social order in North China beginning in the Mongol-Yuan period and extending well to the following Ming dynasty (1368-1644). This distinctive social order is utterly different from the scholarly image of a literati-centered local society in imperial China after the eleventh century.
April 2017, Princeton University
Silk Road Forum.
A public event with lectures in English and Chinese by two keynote speakers (Susan Whitfield, International Dunhuang Project; DU Doucheng, Lanzhou University) and responses by two visiting scholars (YU Xin, Fudan University; Annette Juliano, Rutgers University). Attendance: 105. Forum website:
To learn more, click here.
- The Silk Roads: Leading Us Astray?
Susan Whitfield, IDP, The British Library
Response by Xin YU, Fudan University
Is the Silk Road a meaningful or misleading concept for our understanding of pre-modern Afro-Eurasia? How has its emergence as a worldwide brand and, most recently, as a politico-economic strategy, threatened or assisted scholarship? Should we reject or embrace it? Susan Whitfield will consider these questions, looking at the origin, history and growth of the Silk Road concept and its modern manifestations. - The Ancient Silk Road in Light of New Discoveries in Gansu
Doucheng DU, Lanzhou University
Response by Annette Juliano, Rutgers University
The overland Silk Road may have been opened in ancient times, the maritime route may have developed long before the Song dynasty, and political and military interests may have been stronger than economic ones. This talk introduces recent discoveries in Buddhist archaeology in Gansu province against this historical background.
March 2017, Yale University
Title: “Modernity & Agency: How Activisits reconstructed Nepali Society”
Lecturer: David Gellner (University of Oxford).
Latour’s ideas and terminology have been widely influential within social and cultural anthropology, even amongst those who are not inclined to follow Actor-Network-Theory. Latourian vocabulary for describing the modernity we have never had is acceptable and often suggestive, but Latour’s attack on individual and collective human agency is particularly ill suited to explaining the rise of new kinds of identity. I describe the rise of new ‘ethnic’ and ‘macro category’ identities in Nepal and suggest that the analysis applies to many other social identities as well. I argue that activists are masters and mediators of Latourian ‘hybridity’.
